This is a question that just keeps popping up everywhere. Over and over again.
Why are we
The hiring debate basically has two camps:
One one side is the talent/experience camp. Sometimes also known as the skills camp. Skills like engineering, accounting, scheduling, selling, marketing, machining, programming et al.
On the other side is the attitude camp. This camp argues that what’s most important is things like spirit, teamwork, self-motivation, EQ, ownership.
And there are some with feet in both camps.
But they’re all quibbling about the wrong details.
There’s something else that’s far, far more important than either talent or attitude — and that is “how
Imagine an individual who has a great attitude but is not that insightful. Such an individual would happily and constantly pick the wrong strategies, tactics and techniques. Big fail.
On the flip side, imagine an individual who has all the right hard skills. For example, an accountant proficient with spreadsheets and ledgers and cost accounting and P&L statements et al. But what if this individual is not insightful enough to read between the numbers and so, misses the opportunities and threats to the business? Big fail. Again.
Or, imagine a leader who is up-to-date with all the latest leadership insights. But is not insightful enough to understand what an employee or a customer is really complaining about. Disaster.
Now, rise up to the next level.
Consider an
And in case you’re
Imagine you’ve just been handed a project that will make or break your career. You need to pick one employee to make this project happen. How would you pick such a person? Be honest. You would instinctively look beyond education, experience, skills and attitude — and all those things everyone is quibbling about. Instead, you would home in on the person who is
Insightfulness trumps everything else. If you don’t hire for insightfulness, it will break your career. It’s just a matter of time. If you do hire for insightfulness, it will make the single biggest boost to your career.
I can already hear you protesting, “But insightful people are so rare!”
Indeed, they are. But they’re only rare because we, as leaders, quibble about the wrong details. They’re only rare because we don’t hire for insight
They’re only rare because we confuse being
We train our people to be
We promote people based on how
Going back to the original question in the headline: Yes, both talent and attitude are
important, to different degrees, depending on the job and the responsibility. But you should consider them only after you’ve screened or trained people for being insightful.
And forget that age-old myth that you need age or experience to become insight
This means you can actually train your people (many of them!) to become insight
The sad reality is that most companies today are littered with people who are
What are you waiting for? Isn’t it time you bucked the trend?
Aman
(Aman Motwane)
Heard you in St Cloud. Great! Big whack on the side of the head. Learned a lot. Taking this post to high levels in our organization and asking them — What are we waiting for? 🙂 P
@Pamela: I second that. 🙂 🙂
One of the virtues I love about Aman is how BLUNT he is.
He’s not afraid to say it like it is. He’s not afraid to say the opposite of what the herd is saying. And he’s not afraid to say what NEEDS saying.
I attended a talk of his a while back in Fresno and I was mesmerized.
@Lewis. Well, he’s implying here that many leaders are not insightful, but he doesn’t quite come out and say it.
He said it clearly enough that you understood him. What do you want him to do? Hit you on the head with a 2 by 4?
@Lewis. I think this was a test to see how insightful we are to understand what he’s saying. I think I passed. Maybe I should do a happy dance.
@miryum: The author’s point is “stop quibbling about the wrong details.” And yet, here we are.
[…] Note: There’s a huge difference between people who are full of insights and those who are insightful. See this related post: should you hire for talent or attitude? […]